The journey ends…

1910840_e10ace3c

Hello and welcome to (sadly) the final blog post from yours truly, Joe Bloggs. In this summary post I will be looking back at my journey over the past ten weeks and thinking about how far I, as a student and a teacher, have come. In fact, let’s go right back to my first post “The journey begins” (https://jgamblesite.wordpress.com/2016/02/02/humble-beginnings/) from 2nd February (such a long time ago now…). In this introductory post I provided three key objectives which I wanted to achieve in this blog series:

  • To create a weekly post consisting of 500-1000 words;
  • To focus each post around a particular theme;
  • To incorporate readings from a wide pool of resources – not only what the Module 2 (and indeed Module 1) recommended reading had to say, but also other academic /non-academic information sources.

 

To show how I have achieved these objectives, I will now provide a summary of this “journey” – showing how each weekly blog post theme has linked to the next, which information sources have been my inspiration and what I have learned as a BOE student.

 

Strength in numbers? The perils and pitfalls of online learning communities in supporting students.

 

This post explored online communities in terms of how they relate to supporting students in TEL. As well as describing my own experiences of social media communities, I drew on the U1E3 SBOSE podcast (and in particular the guest speaker James Blake) regarding the opportunities for students/staff with time constraints and feedback. I also considered academic literature from, amongst others, Kamenetz (2010) regarding the introduction of online community tools, as well as a report by Contact North (2013) on what are the inherent types of support available and how the role of the teacher represents a critical determining factor in moderating these online learning communities.

 

Professor Plum to Inspector Gadget? The changing role of the teacher in modern learning environments

 

This post focussed on the previously identified topic of the teacher/tutor role in supporting students in BOE, in which I took inspiration from both the U2E1 SBOSE podcast and a promotional video for the Connections Education Academy (https://youtu.be/64449kcUj-0) in order to create a mock job advertisement for a BOE teacher which highlighted the extent of the role in terms of essential qualities and duties. By discussing my own reflections on the various role elements, the opinions in other students’ blog posts and some key literature arguments such as the suggestion from Kuswara et al. (2008) that teachers must relinquish some intellectual authority and become less instructive, I learned about the important (and ongoing) debates surrounding the teacher role in BOE and the inherent types of support associated with this changing role.

 

Illusion or reality? The use of freedoms and control by online tutors as support mechanisms for students

 

This post addressed questions which were raised in the two previous blog posts regarding what are the different types of support that teachers provide in online learning settings.  The first key sub-topic I considered was the prospect of granting freedom to students, in which I took guidance from the pedagogic literature where some authors such as O’Hare (2011) espoused the control relinquishment argument, whilst others such as Lee and Yau (2015) emphasised the opportunities for teachers to monitor both performance and e-textbook access data by maintaining control through cloud computing. After providing context for these polarising views through my own experiences I also considered the topic of control over online tools, in which McLoughlin and Lee (2007) warned about potential associated controlling behaviour, whereas I reflected upon my own BOE experiences to provide a counter-argument. I also considered a blog post by another student who raised the importance of considering the long-term consequences of using freedoms/controls to support students.

 

Elois or Morlocks? A journey through time towards a balanced view of future online learning practices

 

This blog post advanced the previous post’s identification of the future tense of online learning by taking the concept of The Time Machine by H. G. Wells and writing a short sci-fi story (featuring students and teachers from the course as characters!) involving the positive (Elois) and negative (Morlocks) potential future of BOE learning practices.  I also took inspiration from a YouTube video entitled “Shift Happens” (https://youtu.be/PcZg51Il9no) which demonstrated the true concerns over the technological advancement of knowledge and learning practices. In the story, when the Time Traveller visited the Elois, they advocated the positive future BOE practices by referencing predictions from the literature, for example the suggestion by De Freitas and Liarokapis (2011) that all future learning will involve game-based, immersive and interactive elements. Likewise, when the Time Traveller met the Morlocks, their pessimistic viewpoints were also inspired by predictions from the pedagogic literature, such as the suggestion by Downes (2006) that future personal learning environments will be owned by the students and not controlled by educational institutions.

 

Too much of a good thing? Coping with information overload in online learning environments

 

This blog post took inspiration from Anne’s feedback comments on the previous ‘Time Machine’ post in which she inferred that the real threat facing today’s BOE students relates to mass produced knowledge. The post therefore explored the aspect of information overload and whether or not there is truth to the arguments that more quantity invariably means less quality. I considered what was discussed in the literature, including an argument by Huang et al. (2011) that students are pressurised to exposed themselves to a saturation of online resources over short periods of time, and ultimately identified a key underlying issue relating to the (in)ability to navigate through all the available information. I also took inspiration from the talk by Dr Aileen Wood at the “Leap Into Research” conference which I attended on 2nd March, and ultimately learned about the individual needs of students and the importance of cultural considerations.

 

Lending a helping hand? The global reach of student support in culturally diverse online learning environments

 

In this blog post I developed my understanding of cultural diversity in supporting students in BOE, as identified in the previous post. For this I considered the blog posts of other students, as well as the list of tools which culturally diverse students derive benefits from, according to Fry and Bryant (2006). However, I questioned the real benefits of some of these tools by raising the political limitations which certain international students would face and bringing in some of my own experiences in teaching international students. I considered the suggestion by Lamas et al. (2013) that emphasised the diverse styles/needs of students and acknowledged the fundamental question of which are the most effective online tools for supporting students.

 

The sharpest tool in the box? Considering online tools in supporting BOE students

 

This blog post built upon the previous by advancing the aspect of online tools from the perspective of effectiveness and relevancy. In this post I began with my own reflections of using various tools through this BOE course and other academic circumstances, as well as considering the appraisals in the literature – such as Fu et al. (2013) who unilaterally espouse wiki-based tools or Millar and Schrier (2015) who provide more balanced views on the strengths/weaknesses of e-textbook tools. I also considered the importance of online tool utilisation in isolation in which I concluded that they should be perceived in terms of their overall application due to their context-specific nature. Lastly, I took inspiration from Stewart (2010) who detailed the implications of online tools for students in terms of information sharing.

 

Sharing is caring? Some thoughts on learning-by-sharing as an approach to online student support

 

This penultimate post (and final topic-based post) developed the previous blog’s affordance topic of information sharing and considered this approach in more detail in terms of supporting students in TEL. Here I provided reflections on my own learning experiences which were significantly lacking in information sharing opportunities and questioned whether or not these degree courses would be offered differently (i.e. with more sharing aspects) today. I also explored the blog post of another student who discussed how trust and comfort is associated with this sharing culture in education, as well as considering an influential quotation from the literature in which Mansour et al. (2013) talked in detail about truthfulness validation. This post also highlighted how many of the sub-topics raised (such as the need for a degree of tutor involvement in content provision and synergistic quality enhancement of shared content) had been previously discussed in my earlier blog posts – thereby underscoring the interconnected nature of the themes which I have discussed throughout this blog post series. I hope that in doing so, all those of you who have stuck with these posts to the end of this journey have enjoyed the story of my learning process as I have tackled some of the key topics relating to supporting students in online learning. I know that I have.

The end.

 

References

Contact North (2013) “How to Prepare and Moderate Online Discussions for Online Learning” http://teachonline.ca/sites/default/files/tools-trends/downloads/how_to_plan_for_and_moderate_online_discussions.pdf 1-13.

de Freitas, S., & Liarokapis, F. (2011). Serious games: a new paradigm for education?. In Serious games and edutainment applications (pp. 9-23). Springer London.

Downes, S. (2006) ‘The student’s own education’, webcast seminar at Knowledge Media Institute, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK, 5 June 2006.

Fry, S. W., & Bryant, C. (2006). Using distance technology to sustain teacher education for student teachers in isolated areas: The technology supported induction network. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education,23(2), 63-69.

Fu, H. J., Chu, S., & Kang, W. X. (2013) Affordances and Constraints of a Wiki for Primary-school Students’ Group Projects. Educational Technology & Society, 16 (4), 85–96.

Huang, T.-C., Huang, Y.-M., & Yu, F.-Y. (2011). Cooperative Weblog Learning in Higher Education: Its Facilitating Effects on Social Interaction, Time Lag, and Cognitive Load. Educational Technology & Society, 14 (1), 95–106.

Kamenetz, Anya, (2010) “Chapter 4 : Computer science”, Kamenetz, Anya, DIY U : edupunks, edupreneurs, and the coming transformation of higher education, 81-107, Chelsea Green Publishing

Kuswara, A., Cram, A., & Richards, D. (2008) Web 2.0 supported collaborative learning activities: Towards an affordance perspective. In Proceedings of the 3rd International LAMS & Learning Design Conference (pp. 70-80).

Lamas, D., Välyataga, T., Laanpere, M., Rogalevich, V., Arakelyan, A., Sousa, S., & Shmorgun, I. (2013) Foundations for the Reconceptualization of the e-Textbook. In International Conference on e-Learning (p. 510). Academic Conferences International Limited.

Lee, H. J., & Yau, K. L. A. (2015) Addressing the major Information Technology challenges of electronic textbooks. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 55(2), 40-47.

Mansour, O., Askenäs, L., Ghazawneh, A. (2013) Social Media and Organizing: An Empirical Analysis of the Role of Wiki Affordances in Organizing Practices. In: Thirty Fourth International Conference on Information Systems, Milan 2013

McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. (2007) Social software and participatory learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era. In ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings ascilite Singapore 2007 (pp. 664-675).

Millar, M. & Schrier, T. (2015) Digital or Printed Textbooks: Which do Students Prefer and Why?, Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 15 (2) 166-185.

O‘Hare, S. (2011) The role of the tutor in online learning. In ASCILITE-Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Annual Conference (Vol. 2011, No. 1, pp. 909-918).

Stewart, V. (2010). A classroom as wide as the world. Curriculum 21: Essential education for a changing world, 97-114.

Sharing is caring? Some thoughts on learning-by-sharing as an approach to online student support

knowledge-transfer-790x366

Leadership with education

Hello and welcome to the penultimate (boo!) blog post by Joe Bloggs in which I’ll be presenting the final theme of the blog series before wrapping everything up into a neat little bundle next week. And so what have I chosen for this final blog post theme? Well, for those attentive souls out there, you will remember that last week I identified the topic of learning-by-sharing and raised the question of the validity of this approach and the implications for teachers and students.

So does the sharing of content between students in online environment constitute an effective learning strategy? And how does this affect the teacher-student role? Well, from my own learning background as an undergraduate, postgraduate and doctoral student I have to admit that the vast majority of my learning approach was autonomous in nature and I therefore didn’t have many opportunities to share content with other students. Did I miss a trick there? Well to some extent it depends on the context of the subject matter. My undergraduate degree was in Music / Popular Music which necessitated a significant amount of ‘along time’ in order to compose and practise my instrument. For my Master’s Degree in Marketing we had a block structure to our modules which consisted of 8-hour, 3-day intensive lectures for each module, followed by several weeks at home to complete the assignment before moving onto the next module. Even my doctoral degree encountered a proverbial dead end in the content sharing stakes due to the originality and ‘niche’ of my research topic. Would these degree courses have involved more sharing elements if they had been blended or online courses? Quite possibly and I suspect that in the very near future these same courses will involve both more online elements and content sharing facilities.

So what is the big deal with the sharing of content and information as a student? Well, in Ella’s blog post from 13th March (https://meatyloafy.wordpress.com/2016/03/13/social-presence-who-are-you-on-line/) entitled “Social presence – who are you on line?” she suggests that the sharing the content can facilitate a sense of trust and comfort from other students who review your content before contributing themselves. I think that this is a pertinent point as there can be issues of insecurity or caution – especially from new students and especially towards tutors who they may perceive as detached from their needs as a student. However, this discussion revisits a theme I discussed in an earlier post regarding the need for a certain degree of tutor involvement in the content provision in order to maintain quality levels which challenge and drive student excellence (https://jgamblesite.wordpress.com/2016/03/11/too-much-of-a-good-thing-coping-with-information-overload-in-online-learning-environments/). This issue has also been recently raised by Mansour et al. (2013) in their statement about truthfulness validation:

“Validation as an affordance describes possibilities related to verifying the truthiness of both content and content contributors. It is often enacted when people try in various ways to validate whether content shared on a wiki is true and whether content contributors possess the right background and level of expertise to make a contribution” (p. 14).

So, with the quality or indeed truthfulness of shared content potentially representing a matter of contention for online learning, should we, as educators, be recommending it? Well, this still appears to be the case, judging from the veneration of the concept in recent pedagogic journal publications. For instance, Goodyear (2003) argues that group-based educational activities can actually help to share the cognitive load, depending on the optimisation of the skill mix within the group. This topic of synergistic quality enhancement of shared content through ‘strength in numbers’ was explored in another of my previous blog posts (https://jgamblesite.wordpress.com/2016/02/13/strength-in-numbers-the-perils-and-pitfalls-of-online-learning-communities-in-supporting-students/) and demonstrates the interconnectedness of these student support topics. Another advocate of the learning-by-sharing approach is Wang (2007) who describes how the social presence and associated sharing (of both information and resources) leads to the construction of new knowledge in virtual learning environments. The creation of new knowledge from shared knowledge is certainly an innovative approach and I believe that it could be the key to future effective learning strategies when facilitated and supported by tutors in BOE courses.

Like the other blog posts in this series, I have attempted to not only provide a balanced discussion between my own personal reflections and literature reviews, but also in terms of positive and negative aspects of the chosen blog topic. In doing so with this post, I have also highlighted the correlations between this blog theme of learning-by-sharing and the previous topics explored over the past several weeks. This naturally brings us to next week’s final post in which I will reflect on the thematic progression of my blog post series and what I have learned from each topic about supporting the online learner. Stay tuned.

 

References

Goodyear, Peter, (2003) “Chapter 4 : Psychological foundations for networked learning ” from Steeples, C. and Jones, C., Networked Learning: Perspectives and Issues pp.49-75, London: Springer-Verlag

Mansour, O., Askenäs, L., Ghazawneh, A. (2013) Social Media and Organizing: An Empirical Analysis of the Role of Wiki Affordances in Organizing Practices. In: Thirty Fourth International Conference on Information Systems, Milan 2013